Generous Orthodoxy  




Sunday, April 14, 2013

Glenda Jackson assails Margaret Thatcher's "spiritual" legacy

Wow...check out the performance of the famous actress Glenda Jackson--now a Labour member of Parliament--as she describes what Margaret Thatcher did to undermine "the spiritual foundations of our country." Whatever you may have thought about Mrs. Thatcher, this is well worth your consideration!

Glenda Jackson on Thatcherism: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDtClJYJBj8&feature=share>


Saturday, April 13, 2013

A truly Christ-like life and death

A Roman Catholic Army chaplain, Emil J. Kapaun, has just received a posthumous (very) Medal of Honor at the White House. He died nearly 62 years ago in a prisoner-of-war camp during the Korean War, deliberately starved by the Chinese Communists. It's hard to believe that this story has not been part of public knowledge until now. President Obama said, "This is an amazing story. Father Kapaun's fellow soldiers who felt his grace and his mercy called him a saint, a blessing from God." A parenthetical note is the way that the story touched Obama, who went beyond the official citation to give further details as he continued the compelling narrative of Father Kapaun's self-sacrificing life. Read the whole story here, and don't fail to read all the way to the end.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/us/politics/father-emil-j-kapaun-awarded-medal-of-honor.html


Thursday, April 04, 2013

More on the "evolving" same-sex marriage front

David Brooks is turning out to be a moral hero for me. Odd, because I am emphatically not a Republican and not politically conservative, yet he keeps speaking to and for me. His column yesterday about the way that marriage (including gay marriage) limits "freedom"should ring all sorts of bells for those of us who are Augustinian in theology. Augustine's teaching about "free will," so poorly understood by American Christians, arose out of his growing understanding of his bondage to his own desires. Making the shift from "the devices and desires of our own hearts" to God's desires for us requires accepting limits on our vaunted freedom-which-is-not-really-freedom. Hence Augustine's teaching that "to serve is to reign as a king," more memorably paraphrased by the Book of Common Prayer as "whose service is perfect freedom." The paradox here can be heightened by reference to Paul's discussion of slavery to sin in Romans 7:14-25. John 8:34-36 makes exactly the same point. The contrast between slavery and freedom is more striking than that between service and freedom, though in essence they are the same.

Enacting "the freedom we have in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 2:4) in earthly life does indeed lead us to make binding commitments to others, in all sorts of ways, not only in marriage--but the imagery most often employed in Scripture, from Hosea to Ephesians 5:32, of God's unconditional commitment to us is that of marriage.

Here is Brook's column:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/opinion/brooks-freedom-loses-one.html

Here's an Internet response from "Paul in Lower Manhattan" to Brook's column which neatly expands the thought to suggest the way that restrictions on freedom can actually enhance freedom:

I would not call the advance of gay marriage "a setback for the forces of maximum freedom." But even though I don't agree with David Brooks' premise here, I concede that it is interesting and may have some validity. It is hard to imagine how any real, functional, fully-committed marriage would not create constraints on the spouses. But as much as those constraints may necessarily limit some freedoms, they can open up new freedoms the spouses may never have before imagined. Expanding the thought to various worlds of creativity, many creative people (at least back to Mozart's time and probably earlier) have remarked how having constraints or boundaries are enablers of some of their most creative works. So, why can't constraints of commitment (not constraints of chains or inescapable poverty) be enablers of new, more creative freedoms?